@0li0s's post on Artfol




@0li0s

United States
Manga artist/illustrator
オリオス

Like what you see?
Donate
Is this an unpopular opinion?
I think the NSFW filter should include positions or actions that are inherently pornographic/sexual, even if no genitalia is shown/if the subjects are clothed. The point of the filter is so those uncomfortable with, or not old enough to view sexual art can hide it, so things that seem obviously sexual should be in that filter. I see a lot of stuff that strikes me as too lewd for minors to see but there's no nudity or anything so the poster didn't filter it...Aug 11, 2021
I think the NSFW filter should include positions or actions that are inherently pornographic/sexual, even if no genitalia is shown/if the subjects are clothed. The point of the filter is so those uncomfortable with, or not old enough to view sexual art can hide it, so things that seem obviously sexual should be in that filter. I see a lot of stuff that strikes me as too lewd for minors to see but there's no nudity or anything so the poster didn't filter it...Aug 11, 2021
#question
#opinion
#nsfw
Comments
Agreed! I've seen people try to ' hide' the private parts behind objects in the foreground and that's not cool.
And everyone else here agree! It just assholes who think they are slick wanna try to ' cheat the system '.
And everyone else here agree! It just assholes who think they are slick wanna try to ' cheat the system '.
•
I def think anything super suggestive should def be flagged as nsfw whether fully nude or not. There’s a difference between non suggestive like hugging, kissing, etc, and a lewd version of that or anything else. Even I’ve flagged my own stuff as nsfw despite not having any actual nudity or pornography bc of the sexual energy within it and I didn’t feel comfy minors seeing it. I think people need to stop acting oblivious too cuz like- if you’re a full grown adult you def know what is sexually charged and what isn’t.
•
•This is the quote from the Content Guidelines (under the About section in the profile settings):
“Content that includes full nudity eith sexual implications, partial nudity with sexual implications, or is of a suggestive nature, should be marked as NSFW”
So I would agree that sexual poses with clothes fall under the “is of a suggestive nature” part.
It always strikes me as odd when people don’t want to use the filters for obvious gore/nsfw/etc., cuz the people who have filters on don’t want to see that stuff so they won’t interact with those posts either way :P
“Content that includes full nudity eith sexual implications, partial nudity with sexual implications, or is of a suggestive nature, should be marked as NSFW”
So I would agree that sexual poses with clothes fall under the “is of a suggestive nature” part.
It always strikes me as odd when people don’t want to use the filters for obvious gore/nsfw/etc., cuz the people who have filters on don’t want to see that stuff so they won’t interact with those posts either way :P
•
•Well technically anything sexually suggestive should be flagged NSFW, I'm pretty sure that is in the content guidelines or ToS or something. Some people don't know, some people don't care :/
•
i’ve seen some stuff on the trending page that’s wasn’t technically explicit but definitely not sfw either, so it should’ve had that filter
•

Like what you see?Please consider donating! I send doodles to donors who leave more than $3 <3
Donate
More from this artist

















